Bowen’s promise of a surplus will be hard to fudge

Post date:



Budget surplus

Bowen’s promise of a surplus will be hard to fudge

In Australian politics, handing down a budget surplus has become the acid test of a government’s economic management credentials. The Liberal Party often draws a contrast between the ALP, which has not run a budget surplus since 1989, and the Coalition which, under John Howard, piled up surpluses in the early 2000s. The centrepiece of Treasurer Josh Frydenberg’s budget in April was that he was promising a surplus next year and would keep the budget ‘‘back in black’’ forever.

As shadow treasurer Chris Bowen handed down the costings of ALP policies yesterday with lots of very big numbers, that issue was clearly on his mind. He fired back with a fundamental pledge that he can deliver bigger surpluses than the Liberals.

He is pledging $60 billion of surpluses over the next four years while the Coalition is promising only $41 billion. It is a game of ‘‘my surplus is bigger than yours’’.

Bean counters will quibble over the decimal points but at least, on paper, the ALP has a $20-odd billion advantage because it will raise about $45 billion more in revenue than the Coalition, but only spend about half of it on election pledges such as childcare, health and education.

The extra revenue will either come from closing what Mr Bowen calls tax loopholes, such as franking credit refunds and tax-advantaged distributions from family trusts, or else from reversing the tax cuts for middle- and upper- income earners promised by the Coalition.

Yet Mr Bowen will be haunted by the spectre of his ALP predecessor treasurer Wayne Swan who promised a surplus in his 2012 budget and then failed to deliver.

There is one obvious risk. If Mr Bowen is to avoid Mr Swan’s fate he will have to work out what happens if he cannot pass all his revenue raising measures through the Senate. While he might be able to smuggle some of the measures through in budget supply bills, he will need the support of crossbenchers for most of them and that will sorely test his negotiating skills.

On most projections of the election result, the Senate crossbench will probably not share Mr Bowen’s view that the ALP tax changes only target ‘‘unfair and unsustainable tax loopholes and handouts that go to the top end of town’’.

The Coalition when it came to power counted on spending cuts to help it reach a surplus but the Senate knocked them back. Similarly, Mr Bowen could take years to win passage of the tax changes and in battling to pass them through the Senate he may have to water them down.

Mr Bowen is thus likely to be forced into a choice between his surplus and his populist election commitments. He will come under pressure from the ALP left wing to deliver on the spending promises straight away, even before the revenue measures are in the bag.

Voters must decide whether they trust Mr Bowen, a policy wonk who served as treasurer for three months under Kevin Rudd in 2013, to deliver on his pledge of fiscal conservatism.

Mr Bowen could help build trust by promising that if he fails to pass the tax changes in full and quickly he will put the surplus first and put some of the spending pledges on ice. In that calculation, he should err on the side of caution and ensure that he has a surplus big enough to be robust to any Senate impasses.

The federal government’s pursuit of a surplus should not become a fetish, however, and if there is a serious downturn the government can make things worse by cutting back at the wrong time. But, in the normal course, Mr Bowen should plan to repay debt which has grown over the past decade.

Which points to the other crucial uncertainty that applies equally to both sides of politics: the risk that Treasury’s economic forecasts will prove too optimistic or that an economic shock appears out of nowhere.

Given this inherent uncertainty, it is silly that the ALP has followed the Coalition in the new practice of offering costings of policies going out for a decade. Indeed, Mr Bowen claims boldly that he will deliver budget surpluses between now and 2029-30 that are $87 billion bigger than the Coalition.

This is dreaming. No one knows what the economy will be like in 2029-30 and it is dangerous to use these projections to build up unrealistic expectations.

The ALP has at least taken a more cautious line than the Coalition, which has promised major tax cuts from 2022-23. The ALP has dismissed these as ‘‘never never’’ tax cuts and refrained from spelling out what it plans to do two elections away which is way beyond the range of even the best economic forecaster’s telescope.

Article originally appeared in the SMH 11th May 2019

Chris Bowen - Franking credits

Morrison’s coronavirus pacakage

In this video Australian PM Scott Morrison speaks to reporters in Canberra, outlining initial measures of a $17.6bn package as part of a federal...

What Higher Gas Prices Could Do to the Economy

Migrants and refugees flooding into Europe have presented European leaders and policymakers with their greatest challenge since the debt crisis. The International Organization for...

The Trickle-up Conspiracy

“Try as I might, I cannot pinpoint the exact moment or instance, when the world’s conservative parties shifted from extolling tradition and practising good...

Australian democracy is at risk. If we want to save it,...

The Guardian's Katharine Murphy asks Sports rorts. Unlawful robodebts. More than $80m in election donations. Is this the governance we want? According to the Australian Electoral...

‘Bushfire brandalism’: Australian artists replace bus shelter ads with political posters

“Bushfire Brandalism” Pedestrians in some suburbs of Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane would have walked straight past activist artists (vandals, some critics might call them) removing...

Morrison’s Sports grant review is a joke

Why we need strong ethical standards for ministers – and better ways of enforcing them Prime Minister Scott Morrison has asked his department to probe...

The Devil and Scott Morrison

What do we know about the prime minister’s Pentecostalism? By James Boyce In his first major speech as prime minister, Scott Morrison pointed to his heart...

The Pitfalls of Outsourcing Public Welfare & Healthcare

When it comes to rooting out wasteful spending in federal entitlement programs, attention has long focused on preventing beneficiaries from gaming the system.   A new...

The Strait of Hormuz is the most important oil choke point...

The Strait of Hormuz is the most important oil choke point in the world. Use our interactive map to explore it Wes Mountain/The Conversation, CC...

Australia COVID-19 Coronavirus Live Data Maps


Coronavirus Timelapse Map

Coronavirus Timelapse Map January 24, 2020 to March 5, 2020   How Coronavirus has spread outside of China January 24, 2020 to March 5,...

Coronavirus mortality Australia

The little, inconsequential, health statistics that Scott Morrison, his MP's and the so called Health experts, DO NOT WANT you to focus on. It might...

Coronavirus (COVID-19) in Australia

Coronavirus Australia  

Morrison’s coronavirus pacakage

In this video Australian PM Scott Morrison speaks to reporters in Canberra, outlining initial measures of a $17.6bn package as part of a federal...