Charles Livingstone, Monash University

Since then-prime minister Julia Gillard appointed Peter Slipper to the speaker’s chair in 2011, the gambling lobby has appeared triumphant in defeating any substantial reform of gambling regulation.

Slipper became speaker because Gillard was under enormous pressure to back down on her agreement with independent MP Andrew Wilkie. Wilkie had agreed to support her minority government in the parliament, but one of his conditions was to introduce a pre-commitment system for poker machines.

The gambling industry took this very seriously. ClubsNSW and various associates saw the reforms off with a highly effective and multi-pronged campaign.

Kevin Rudd was agitating for restoration to the prime ministership, and promised to abolish the pre-commitment deal. Nervous backbenchers were taking notice. Wilkie was let go, and Slipper’s defection from the Liberal Party meant Gillard kept the numbers on the floor of the House of Representatives.

Kevin Andrews, the Abbott government’s first social services minister, oversaw the abandonment of even the very modest reforms Gillard legislated after she reneged on her agreement with Wilkie. These involved the introduction over a period of time of:

gamblers-attitudes-graph-2_650px

  • a “voluntary” pre-commitment system;
  • imposition of a A$250 daily limit on ATM withdrawals in gambling venues;
  • establishment of a national gambling research centre; and
  • establishment of a national gambling regulator.

Only the research centre survived.

What is the federal government’s role?

State governments traditionally regulate gambling in Australia. They tend to work closely with “industry” to promote gambling’s benefits, as they see them.

These benefits include revenue for cash-strapped state treasuries (about $5.75 billion a year, $3.5 billion of it from pokies), glitzy tourist attractions (even if most of the money lost comes from locals), and happy gambling-business operators.

The downside – significant harm to gamblers and their families, friends and others – tends to be downplayed. Recent reports funded by the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, an arms-length government agency, puts the scale of gambling harm at about the same order of magnitude as the harms of alcohol.

A lack of effective policy from state governments is why Nick Xenophon, and others like Wilkie and the Greens, have looked to the federal government to reform Australia’s gambling environment.

But the powerful forces arrayed against reform have kept it off the table since Gillard’s backdown.

gambling-addiction650pxWhere to start?

There’s little doubt the federal government can regulate gambling. It has clear power to make laws about telecommunications – thus, internet gambling is its domain. The Interactive Gambling Act, for all its faults, is evidence of that.

However, the corporations power given to the Commonwealth by the constitution also provides a basis for regulating any activity undertaken by a corporation. Gillard was convinced that her government could do so.

But as the events of 2010-13 demonstrated, power doesn’t always flow from the words of the constitution, however elegant. Well-resourced business interests, whether they’re clubs, hotels, casinos or multinational bookies, have a habit of wanting – and getting – their own way.

Right now there is no enthusiasm among the major parties for gambling reform. The Liberals’ 2013 gambling policy looked like the clubs wrote it. It doesn’t appear to have one for this election – and nor does Labor. Perhaps they learned their lessons last time around.

Nonetheless, the Coalition has proposed changes to the Interactive Gambling Act. But none of these have been legislated, nor is any draft legislation available.

If these changes do come into effect, they may well be positive. Prohibiting online in-play betting, credit betting, and establishing a national self-exclusion register would be positive steps.williamhill

What hasn’t been contemplated, by either major party, is a prohibition on gambling advertising during sporting broadcasts. It also wasn’t countenanced by the O’Farrell review of the Interactive Gambling Act, and wasn’t considered in the government’s response.

It is probably not the gambling industry that has been most effective on keeping that off the agenda, however. The revenue that flows from all those TV ads goes into the coffers of the broadcasting industry. From there, it finds its way onto the bottom line of the major sporting codes, via inflated broadcast rights.

It is hard to find a politician who wants to get on the bad side of the TV networks, sporting codes and bookmakers all at the same time.

However, a phase-out of TV gambling advertising is likely to be effective at reducing the uptake of gambling problems. It was an initial and successful element of the campaign against tobacco. Such a policy could be introduced over a number of years to allow the financial impacts to be factored in.gambling650px

What about the pokies?

The biggest issue in Australian gambling, however, is the pokies. As Gillard found, this is a business with a lot at stake – about $11 billion a year, in fact, and largely in New South Wales.

Making pokies less addictive would be a great start to tackling the harm they bring. Changes to the machine’s features like the reinforcement schedules, uneven “reels”, and “losses disguised as wins” would help do this, as would reduced maximum bets and effective (not “voluntary”) pre-commitment.

Taxing giant clubs like the corporations they actually are might be a useful way to ensure the community benefits asserted by the gambling industry actually flow. This was certainly the Productivity Commission’s view.

It would be great to get out from under Australia’s reputation as the world’s biggest gambling losers. If Xenophon, Wilkie and others can influence the new parliament, the seeds of this might well be sown.

Charles Livingstone, Senior Lecturer, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Save

Save

Save

Save

Video Game skins gambling

Australia’s biggest gambling operators be warned – media pack is baying...

0
Often enough, a single news organisation will crack an important story or begin a worthy crusade and the rest of the media ignore it...

The latest casino scandal is just another sideshow

0
Another casino, another official investigation, more allegations of money laundering, organised crime links and fraud. At a casino? Gee, who would have guessed? And, again, Star...

The uncivil Mr Jones

0
View from The Hill: The uncivil Mr Jones Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra The row over shock jock Alan Jones and what will be displayed on...

History repeats: how O’Farrell and Greiner fell foul of ICAC

0
In April 2014, the New South Wales Independent Commission into Corruption (ICAC) claimed its biggest political scalp in two decades. Liberal state premier Barry...

No risk: The family who own Tasmania’s gambling industry

0
Every single gaming machine in the state is theirs. The Keno is theirs. They own one of the two casinos and a controlling stake...

Support Pigsfly Newspaper

Become a Supporter
by donating $1.00

Unlike many online news portals, Pigsfly Newspaper doesn’t hold any annoying advertising, we don’t try and sell you anything nor have we put up a paywall – We want to keep my communiques as open and honest as we can.

Pigsfly Newspaper is fiercely independent and they take a fair bit of time, money and hard yakka to produce. We want to continue delivering Pigsfly Newspaper to you.

But we need your help!

BECOME A SUPPORTER FOR $1 A MONTH

Your support is crucial to maintain Pigsfly Newspaper

Each year Pigsfly Newspaper cover a range of topics including:

Political nonsense, spin, plain bulls**t, lies and fabrications
Lobbyists
Political donors
Gambling lobbyists and all that entails
Mining and Energy tax avoidance not in the least our continual focus on the ongoing rape of Australia’s precious resources
Tax avoidance and the industry that supports and profits
New twists on business perspectives
Old twists on political party electioneering rorts rip offs and such like
Photography
Music and
Fascinating bits and bobs you would be hard pressed to find elsewhere.

For 2018 several Pigsfly Newspaper Long Reads are planned.
On the drawing board include:
• Politicians and their “Entitlements?”
• The FUA Awards and
much much more

Your support – click below – is greatly appreciated and helps us, continue to help you.

Comments? Write to us through our Contact page

Click the button below to become a Pigsfly Newspaper Supporter
by donating $1 a month




Unfair? Unethical? or Corrupt? ‘Personal’ donations to the Liberal Party came...

0
A national vaping lobby group donated a total of $44,000 to the Liberal Party but the money was declared as personal gifts from its...

Energy crisis: The truth behind the price surge

0
Mike Seccombe writes in The Saturday Paper As Australia grapples with the near collapse of its east coast energy market, there are a few names...

How Nationals and lobbyists play the new climate wars

0
By The SaturdayPaper's Marian Wilkinson   Young and with a ready smile, James Thomson appears an unlikely foot soldier in the new climate wars. But the Maitland...

Lobbyland: The scourge of powerful special interests and lobbyists

0
By John Menadue This article was first published on October 29, 2020.A major reason for the loss of trust in governments and parliaments is the...

Beware the ‘mog’: If only politicians realised playing God is not...

0
Queensland’s politicians need be less god-like and more business-like when it comes to “mogging” their public servants writes Robert MacDonald. Once you start looking for lack...

Reframing tax policy to reset the rules of the monopoly game

0
Monopolists and rentseekers have been running rings round the democratic fiscal state for decades. It is obvious to everyone that the game is rigged....

Paddy Manning paints a vivid portrait of a man born into...

0
Now that Rupert Murdoch is in his nineties, the question of succession has become unavoidable. His oldest son, Lachlan, would seem to be the...

Robo-debt: Liberals knew it was illegal before it started

0
David Mason was the first person to give advice about a thought bubble program that would become robo-debt. In an email, he called it...

Jim Chalmers’ ‘restraint’ budget the first stage of a marathon for...

0
Jim Chalmers’ ‘restraint’ budget the first stage of a marathon for the treasurer Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra Jim Chalmers’ inaugural budget plants its feet as solidly...

Smart Home Blog

0

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save