‘Honeygate’ deepens as new tests reveal 27% of brands are adulterated

File 20181003 699 1dqr25z.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1
The new discovery significantly deepens the ‘fake honey’ scandal.
Subbotina Anna/Shutterstock.com

Mark Patrick Taylor, Macquarie University and Xiaoteng Zhou, Macquarie University

More than a quarter of commercial honey brands have potentially been watered down with sugar cane, corn syrup or other products, according to our new analysis of 95 products from local food markets and supermarket shelves.

Our discovery is set to deepen the concern over the authenticity of honey for sale in Australia, in the wake of last month’s “fake honey” scandal, which revealed the widespread adulteration of honey with cheaper substances.

Australia is the world’s fourth-largest honey exporter, and the revelations pose a threat to its reputation as a leading producer and supplier of honey.

Read more:
What is fake honey and why didn’t the official tests pick it up?

Our study, published in Nature’s Scientific Reports, analysed 100 honeys from 19 countries, including Australia. The study included five raw honey samples (that is, honey direct from the hive) and 95 commercial samples, 38 of them from Australian-based producers.

Analysis of the 95 commercial honeys showed that 27% of them were of “questionable authenticity”, meaning they had potentially been adulterated with cane and/or corn syrups. This means they should not be classified as genuine pure honey.

Of the Australian-sourced commercial honeys we analysed, 18% were identified as likely to have been adulterated in a similar way.

Results of pure and adulterated Australasian honeys analysed in this study.
Monique Chilton/Copperplate Design

Our study used the only internationally accepted method for determining honey adulteration. This method detects the presence of sugars from a type of plants known as C4 plants – the group that includes corn and sugar cane – as opposed to pure honey, which is made from the nectar of flowers from a different group, called C3 plants.

C4 and C3 plants each have unique isotopic signatures, which allows us to ascertain whether a honey sample is pure (containing only compounds from C3 plants) or whether it has been adulterated with sugars from C4 plants.

An old problem

Honey adulteration is nothing new. It has been on the rise since the 1970s, when cheap high-fructose corn syrup became widely available. Because both corn syrup and sugar cane are cheaper than honey, they are an easy way to increase honey volume and boost profits.

Some operators adulterate honey with rice sugars that enable them to circumvent the C4 test. Some rice syrup producers openly advertise the fact that their products will not cause adulterated honeys to fail the C4 test.

Honey can be adulterated either during or after production. Inadvertent adulteration might happen through overfeeding of sucrose to bees during periods when food sources are limited, or at harvest time. This practice, if done occasionally, can protect colonies at times of low food availability. But if used injudiciously it can also filter through into the finished product.

Of course, our study also comes hot on the heels of recent revelations that 12 of 28 Australian honeys were adulterated with rice and other syrups. That discovery was made using a new proprietary method that can reportedly detect adulteration with a wider range of compounds and also identify the geographic origins of the honey. However, this method does not currently meet the provisions of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, the international body that sets food standards.

Our research group has previously shown that honey can indeed be traced back to its point of origin, by comparing trace chemicals in bees and their honey with those in the dusts and soils where it was produced.

In our latest research, we therefore also investigated whether the commercial honey samples can indeed be tracked back to where they supposedly came from. We found that honey from different continents and regions do indeed have different chemical signatures, which paves the way for detecting mislabelled or geographically fraudulent honey.

Read more:
How better tests and legal deterrence could clean up the sticky mess left behind by fake honey row

There is no evidence that adulterated honeys cause any significant health risk (beyond those posed by eating sugary foods anyway). However, in many cases consumers are not getting the supposedly genuine pure honey they have paid for.

But our research, along with previous studies, reveals the scale of the problem.

For Australian honey to retain its premium position in the global market, there needs to be a better framework around the chain of custody and certification of honey. Only then will customers have a guarantee that their “pure” honey is exactly what it says on the label.The Conversation

Mark Patrick Taylor, Professor of Environmental Science, Macquarie University and Xiaoteng Zhou, PhD candidate, Macquarie University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

The Pitfalls of Outsourcing Public Welfare & Healthcare

When it comes to rooting out wasteful spending in federal entitlement programs, attention has long focused on preventing beneficiaries from gaming the system.   A new...

Leadership drought reaps its harvest

Leadership drought reaps its harvest As John Hewson wrote, The global world of politics is beginning to embrace the digital newsroom adage: Wrong, but not...

Viewpoint: What’s in half a degree of climate change?

Viewpoint: What's in half a degree of climate change? Our dual needs to save the planet and power our modern lives have thrown a spotlight on...

Lobbyists, Influencers and self interest. Welcome to Scott Morrison’s informed world

'Brutal': Marcia Langton, early backer of welfare card, savages its roll out One of the few Indigenous community leaders who backed the cashless welfare card...

The full list of 3000-plus speed camera sites in Queensland

Leadfoot drivers pour millions of dollars into the Queensland government's coffers every year. Government revenue from fines and forfeitures, which includes fixed and mobile camera...

The decoy effect: how you are influenced to choose without really...

The decoy effect: how you are influenced to choose without really knowing it The decoy effect is the phenomenon where consumers swap their preference between...

‘Age of Sail’

***2018 OFFICIAL SELECTION VENICE FILM FESTIVAL*** Set on the open ocean in 1900, Age of Sail is the story of William Avery (voiced by Ian...

Wildlife photographer of the year: 2018

Dutch photographer Marsel van Oosten has won the grand title with his photo of critically endangered golden snub-nosed monkeys in China
Web Hosting